ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Market Value

     There is no public trading market for the Common Stock of Security Capital Corporation. The articles and bylaws of Security Capital Corporation give Security Capital Corporation a right of first refusal to acquire shares when a shareholder wishes to sell stock.
 

Dividends

     Security Capital Corporation paid an annual cash dividend of $1.00 per share in 2005, and $.95 per share (split adjusted) in 2004. The primary source of funds for dividends paid by Security Capital Corporation to its shareholders is the dividend income received from First Security Bank. There are certain restrictions on the payment of such dividends imposed by federal and state banking laws, regulations and authorities. Under Mississippi law, the payment of dividends by First Security Bank must be approved by the Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance. The FDIC also has the authority to regulate the payment of dividends and to prohibit a regulated depository institution from engaging in what, in such agency’s opinion, constitutes an unsafe or unsound practice for conducting business. Depending upon the financial condition of the depository institution, payment of dividends could be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice. In addition, a depository institution may not pay a dividend or otherwise make a capital distribution if the payment thereof would cause such institution to fail to satisfy its capital requirements.

     At December 31, 2005, there were 718 stockholders of record of the Company's common stock
 

Five Year Financial Summary

     The following table sets forth certain financial information for Security Capital Corporation on a consolidated historical basis. Such information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the consolidated financial statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report. 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

     Release 33-8098 requires the company to disclose any accounting estimates based on highly uncertain data and any material impact from adopting an accounting statement or policy.

     The primary area in which there is uncertainty is the potential losses in the loan portfolio. In this area, an estimate is derived from an analysis of the loan portfolio and the Allowance for Loan Losses of the loans and the loan types that pose a risk of being a future loss. To prepare for the potential loss, an increase will be made to the loan loss reserve, if needed, for the inclusion of the balances or a percentage of the balances of the identified risks in the loan portfolio. With the need to increase the Allowance for Loan Losses, an increase will occur in bad debt expense or the Provision for Loan Losses expense which ultimately lowers the net income which is reflected on the Income Statement. In addition, the building up of the Allowance for Loan Losses results in a decrease in the total assets reflected on the balance sheet by the decrease in the net loan portfolio. The amount expensed - which is a non-cash transaction - for the accounting period will be an adjustment on the Statement of Cash Flows. In 2005, the allocation to Allowance for Loan Losses increased expenses and lowered net income and net assets by $1,440 thousand. For future periods, the affect on the income statement and the balance sheet will be dependent on the amount of loan charge offs and the strength of the loan portfolio for the accounting period. If the charge offs decrease and the analysis of the loan portfolio and the Allowance for Loan Losses determine no additional provisions are required, the cease or decrease of the accrual estimate will boost income and net assets. See “Allowance and Provision for Loan Losses” for more details.
 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003

     Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations analyzes the major elements of Security Capital Corporation's balance sheets and statements of income. This section should be read in conjunction with Security Capital Corporation's Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in this report.

     This discussion includes various forward-looking statements with respect to credit quality (including delinquency trends and the allowance for loan losses), corporate objectives and other financial and business matters. When used in this discussion the words "anticipate," "project," "expect," "believe," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Security Capital Corporation cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, all of which may change over time. Actual results could differ materially from forward-looking statements.

In addition to factors disclosed by Security Capital Corporation elsewhere in this report, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements: exposure to local economic conditions, interest rate risk, credit quality, risks inherent in consumer and commercial lending, competition, and the extent and timing of legislative and regulatory actions and reforms.
 

Results of Operations

Overview

     Security Capital Corporation earned $6,606,641 or $2.53 per share for 2005, $6,132,173 or $2.35 per share for 2004, and $5,517,464 or $2.12 per share for 2003 representing an increase of $1,089,177 or $.41 per share for the period from year 2003 through year 2005. These changes are due to the general growth of the banking operation and the effective management of the assets and liabilities.
 

Net Interest Income

     Net interest income is the most significant component of Security Capital Corporation’s earnings. Net interest income is the difference between interest and fees realized on earning assets, primarily loans and securities, and interest paid on deposits and other borrowed funds. The net interest income is determined by several factors, including the volume of earning assets and liabilities, the mix of earning assets and liabilities and interest rates. Although there are a certain number of these factors which can be controlled by management policies and actions, there are certain other factors, such as the general level of credit demand, the Federal Reserve Board monetary policy, and changes in tax law that are beyond the control of management.

     The increase in net interest income in 2005 as compared to 2004 is due primarily to the increase in loans.

     The following table sets forth the major components of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities for three consecutive years ending December 31, 2005. In the table below, the loan interest includes loan fees and the interest on securities considers discount accretion and premium amortization.

     The following table sets forth net interest earning assets and liabilities for 2005, 2004 and 2003.

Table 3A - Volume/Rate Analysis depicts the dollar effect of volume and rate changes from 2003 to 2005. Variances which were not specifically attributable to volume or rate were allocated proportionately between rate and volume using the absolute values of each for a basis for the allocation. Non-accruing loans were included in the average loan balances used in determining the yields.

Non-Interest Income and Non-Interest Expense

     Non-interest expense increased by 7.46% from 2003 to 2004 and increased by 13.48 % from 2004 to 2005, primarily because of increases in salaries and employee benefits. Increases in non-interest expense signifies Security Capital Corporation’s preparation for a move into a new market area in Desoto County that required expenditures for banking facilities as well as training employees to perform the operational procedures. Security Capital Corporation has provided its Desoto County locations with new state of the art buildings to address the needs of its staff and the increase in business as well as to present an attractive banking establishment for its customers. With the establishment of a new facility, other costs are involved such as the purchase of new equipment and the increase in the maintenance costs of the equipment. In addition to the increase in employees, salaries and employee benefits normally increase in a range from 3% to 7% dependent on the profits and the attainment of performance goals.

     Included in the 2004 non-interest income is an insurance settlement payment of $350,000 for loss of the original branch building in 2002 due to fire. This payment was partially offset by loss of $123,000 on disposal of obsolete fixed assets. For 2005, non-interest income increased by $494 from 2004 to 2005, primarily in the area of service charges. The components of non-interest income in 2005 reflect a steady increase attributable to the growth of the business with no non-routine transaction of material value to report.

     The following table provides details on non-interest income and expense for the Years ended December 31, 2003 through 2005.

Income Taxes

     Security Capital Corporation records a provision for income taxes currently payable, along with a provision for those taxes in the future. Such deferred taxes arise from differences in timing of certain items for financial statement reporting rather than income tax reporting. Security Capital Corporation benefits in its computation of income taxes due from having tax-exempt securities and loans.

Financial Condition

Loans

     The loan portfolio constitutes the major earning asset of Security Capital Corporation and in the opinion of management offers the best alternative for maximizing interest spread above the cost of funds. The continuing loan growth is primarily due to Security Capital Corporation’s move to a market area that is experiencing rapid growth in the building of residential and commercial structures. Real Estate Loans and Commercial Loans comprise the largest segment of the loan portfolio. Commercial loans which bear a higher degree of risk comprise 5.55% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2005. Agricultural loans, another type of loan that carries a higher degree of risk, are only 1.62% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2005.

Authorization of Loans

     The Board of Directors of the Corporation has approved guidelines and policies specific for each type loan. These guidelines are followed under the direction of the President and the Senior Loan Officer. All loans made above $25,000 will be presented by the officer originating the loan to a committee of loan officers for a review of the maker(s), the repayment ability, source of repayment, type and sufficiency of collateral and length of repayment. The loans reviewed will be compiled into a report certifying that the loans have been made in accordance with the Board approved policies and principles. This periodic report is submitted to the Directors Loan Committee for review and then ratified at the next scheduled meeting. Each loan officer has an individual lending limit (not to exceed the legal limit of $250,000) which is awarded based on his or her lending experience and length of service. Any loan in excess of the loan officer’s limit must be approved prior to consummation by the Senior Loan Officer or the President or the Board of Directors or by a combined lending authority with another loan officer. All loans or lines of credit over $250,000 must be pre-approved by the Directors Loan Committee.

Collateral and Documentation Requirements

     All loans must have an ample margin of safety between the loan advance and the current fair value of the collateral. The benchmark, under normal circumstances, is loan advances for all types of loans and should not exceed 80% of the current fair value of the collateral. However, decisions of judgment are needed in special circumstances and this percentage may be reduced by the abnormality/unusual nature of the collateral. Documentation of the collateral is properly collected before the loan transaction is completed and will meet the requirements (to name a few) of the Mississippi Uniform Commercial Code, the Loan Policy, and all pertinent regulations. In an effort to secure and to protect the liens of the First Security Bank, a staff provides loan management with periodic reports highlighting loan accounts requiring additional documentation. In addition, the compliance and loan review officer along with the internal audit staff monitor the procedures on an ongoing basis with reports for management of any deficiencies.

Characteristics, Criteria and Risks of Types

     The composition of the loan portfolio consists chiefly of real estate, agricultural, consumer and commercial loans. Real estate loans, in addition to the general collateral and documentation requirements, require the performance of an appraisal or evaluation before the credit decision is made. An appraisal is required for all new real estate loans where the loan amount is $250,000 or greater. All appraisals must be prepared by a certified appraiser. However, on 1-4 family residential real estate loans less than $1,000,000, the appraisal may be prepared by a licensed appraiser. For small loans (less than $250,000), the appraisals may be performed by a certified or licensed in-house appraiser. Real estate loans are normally considered a low risk due to the required strength in collateral. Agricultural loans mandate an extensive review of the customer’s farming tract record, financial statements, cash flow statements, projected income and collateral. The depth of these reviews should determine the honesty, integrity, the debt status, the repayment ability and the collateral strength of the farmer. To combat this high risk area, the bank’s policy is for production loans to be completely secured with tangible assets and not to exceed 60% of the projected cash repayment ability. Consumer loans is another area of high risk due to the type and location of the collateral and the volatility of the economy which may affect the payback ability of the customer. The consumer loans normally require the pledging of collateral. However, up to $10,000 may be extended without the pledging of the collateral but must be based on the creditworthiness of the loan applicant. Credit card loans (a very high risk area) - in the consumer group - require a financial statement submitted in order for a credit limit of $5,000 and over to be granted. Commercial loans require a review of the purpose and the assessment of the future benefit of the operation, the financial statements, and the collateral on the onset to determine the strength of the potential loan asset. The degree of risks associated with the commercial lending is dependent on the completeness of the initial loan evaluation process.

Concentration of Credit

     The bank monitors its loans in a manner that the loan portfolio will not represent an excessive risk due to concentrations of credit from a large volume of economically related assets advanced to one individual, related groups of borrowers or industry. Loans to one individual or corporation shall not exceed the limits set by state law. Mississippi state law states that the limit of lending to one individual or entity shall not exceed 20% of unimpaired capital and reserves. To keep abreast of the loan concentrations, a tracking of individual borrowers, related groups of borrowers and industry groups as well as geographical locations is compiled in a quarterly report that is presented to the Directors Loan Committee.

     The following table reflects outstanding balances by loan types for the past five years.

     The following table reflects the maturity schedule or repricing frequency of all loans that will reprice or mature within one year.

     The provision for loan losses represent charges made to earnings to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses. The allowance is maintained at an amount believed by management to be sufficient to absorb losses inherent in the credit portfolio. Factors considered in establishing an appropriate allowance include: a careful assessment of the financial condition of the borrower; a realistic determination for the value and adequacy of underlying collateral; the condition of the local economy and the condition of the specific industry of the borrower; a comprehensive analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories; and review of delinquent and classified loans.

     Security Capital Corporation maintains a comprehensive loan review program to evaluate loan administration, credit quality, and loan documentation. This program includes a regular review of problem loans, delinquencies, and charge-offs. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a quarterly basis. This evaluation focuses on specific loan reviews, changes in the type and volume of the loan portfolio given the current and forecasted economic conditions, and historical loss experience. Any one of the following conditions may necessitate a review of a specific loan: a question of whether the customer’s cash flow or net worth may not be sufficient to repay the loan; the loan has been criticized in a regulatory examination; the accrual of interest has been suspended; serious delinquency; or other reasons where either the ultimate collectibility of the loan is in question or the loan has other special or unusual characteristics which require special monitoring.

     Activity in the allowance for loan losses is reflected in Table 7 - Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses. The recorded values of loans and leases actually removed from the consolidated balance sheets are referred to as charge-offs and, after netting out recoveries on previously charged-off assets, become net charge-offs. Security Capital Corporation’s policy is to charge-off loans, when, in management’s opinion, the loan is deemed uncollectible, although concerted efforts are made to maximize recovery.

     The consolidated reserve for loan losses reflected in Table 7 are the balances remaining after the charge offs for the year.

     The loan portfolio contained $14 thousand in non-accrual loans represented by one loan and an aggregate of $786 thousand of 90 days past due and over as of December 31, 2005. If the non-accrual loans had been performing loans during the 2005 period, interest income would have shown an addition of $2 thousand. The 90 days and over past due loans, classified as being well-secured and capable of being collected, were not subject to a non-accrual status and interest is accrued and recognized daily as income. The interest income recognized in 2005 for the loans classified as 90 days and over past due at December 31, 2005, totaled $43 thousand.