|
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM NO. 1.
BUSINESS
General Development and Structure of Business
Security Capital
Corporation is a one-bank holding company and has two subsidiaries,
First Security Bank and Batesville Security Building Corporation.
As a bank holding company, Security Capital Corporation
engages in the business of banking through its sole banking
subsidiary and may engage in certain non-banking activities closely
related to banking and may own certain other business corporations
that are not banks, subject to applicable laws and regulations.
Security Capital Corporation is not currently engaging in non-bank
activities, and does not own any business corporations except for
Batesville Security Building Corporation and has no current plans to
engage in non-bank activities or own any other business
corporations.
Security Capital Corporation was incorporated on
September 16, 1982 for the purpose of acquiring First Security Bank
and serving as a one-bank holding company.
First Security Bank was originally chartered under the
laws of the State of Mississippi on October 25, 1951.
Batesville Security Building Corporation, the nonbank
subsidiary, was chartered under the laws of the State of Mississippi
on June 23, 1971, for the purpose of acquiring real estate; to hold,
improve, develop, operate, manage, mortgage, sell, exchange and
lease and to generally deal and manage real estate and personal
property. Batesville Security Building Corporation is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Security Capital Corporation which has been inactive
in the past years but in 2004 reactivated its operations by
investing in new leasehold improvements.
Security Capital Corporation’s home or principal office
is located at 295 Highway 6 West, Batesville, Mississippi, 38606.
The telephone of the home or principal office is (662) 563-9311.
First Security Bank's website is
www.firstsecuritybk.com
Operations
Security Capital
Corporation, through First Security Bank, engages in a wide range of
banking activities, including accepting demand deposits, accepting
savings and time deposit accounts, making secured and unsecured
loans to corporations, individuals and others, issuing credit cards,
issuing and processing ATM cards and debit cards, issuing commercial
and standby letters of credit, originating mortgage loans, and
providing personal and corporate trust services.
Security Capital Corporation’s lending services include
commercial, real estate, installment, credit card loans, merchant
accounts receivable loans, student loans, and agricultural loans.
Revenues from Security Capital Corporation’s Lending activities
constitute the largest component of Security Capital Corporation’s
operating revenues.
At December 31, 2004, the loan portfolio totaled
$234,403 constituting 67% of the earning assets of $349,276.
Security Capital Corporation’s loan personnel have the authority to
extend credit under guidelines established and approved by the Board
of Directors. Any aggregate credit which exceeds the authority of
the loan officer or a combination of several authority limits is
forwarded to the Loan Committee for approval. The Loan Committee is
comprised of various Bank Directors, including the Chairman.
Security Capital Corporation’s primary lending areas
are the counties of Desoto, Panola, Quitman and Tunica in the State
of Mississippi. Security Capital Corporation may extend credit to
borrowers out of the primary lending area but on a limited basis in
which the risk is low and/or a relationship may exist with the
borrower and an industry or a development in the primary lending
area.
The following tables provide demographic information
for Desoto, Panola, Quitman and Tunica counties, and for the State
of Mississippi:
POPULATION
| |
2000 |
1990 |
1980 |
1970 |
| DeSoto |
107,199
|
67,910
|
53,930
|
35,885
|
| Panola |
34,274
|
29,996
|
28,164
|
26,829
|
| Quitman |
10,117
|
10,490
|
12,636
|
15,888
|
| Tunica |
9,277
|
8,164
|
9,652
|
11,854
|
|
Mississippi |
2,844,658 |
2,573,216 |
2,520,698 |
2,216,994 |
SOURCE: Center for Population Studies, University
of Mississippi
PER CAPITA INCOME
| |
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
1999 |
1998 |
| Desoto |
$27,261
|
$27,344 |
$26,074 |
$24,537 |
$23,970 |
| Panola |
18,510
|
18,233 |
17,188 |
16,242 |
15,805 |
| Quitman |
15,854 |
17,183 |
14,720 |
14,568 |
14,010 |
| Tunica |
17,763 |
18,966 |
17,328 |
17,335 |
16,395 |
| Mississippi |
22,550 |
21,967 |
21,007 |
20,053 |
19,545 |
SOURCE: United States Department of Commerce,
Bureau of Economic Analysis
MEDIAN AGE
| |
2000 |
1990 |
| DeSoto |
33.7 |
31.5 |
| Panola |
33.0 |
30.1 |
| Quitman |
31.8 |
30.1 |
| Tunica |
30.6 |
25.3 |
SOURCE: Center for Population Studies, University
of Mississippi
Panola County and Quitman
County are rural areas, in which agriculture and industry play a big
part in the economy. Desoto County and Tunica County have a
different economic structure. The growth and composition of Desoto
County has been dictated, primarily, by the outflow from Memphis,
Tennessee, seeking residential living developments as well as
locations for retail businesses and other commercial developments
outside the Memphis city limits. Tunica County’s economy is
dependent on the gaming industry to provide employment and to
provide resources for the operation of the county. The numerous
casinos in the Tunica area employ residents from the surrounding
counties and residents from the States of Tennessee and Arkansas.
Security Capital Corporation has in the past and
intends to continue to make most types of real estate loans
including but not limited to single and multi-family housing, farm
loans, residential and commercial construction loans and loans for
commercial real estate.
Major classifications of loans were as follows:
|
|
December 31, |
2004
(In thousands) |
|
2002
(In thousands) |
| Commercial, financial and
agricultural |
$
28,077 |
|
$
32,878 |
| Real estate construction
and development |
49,189 |
|
37,116 |
| Real estate mortgage
|
124,911 |
|
103,348 |
| Installment loans to
individuals |
29,898 |
|
28,529 |
| Other |
2,328 |
|
_ 2,553 |
| |
234,403 |
|
204,424 |
| Less allowance for loan
losses |
(3,598) |
|
(3,665) |
| |
$230,805 |
|
$200,759 |
The success of the loan
portfolio is not dependent on a single borrower or group of
borrowers. The large loans of the loan portfolio are defined as
those loans with a balance of $337,000 and over. As of December 31,
2004, the loan portfolio totals $234.4 million of which the large
lines total $65 million representing 68 borrowers.
Security Capital Corporation provides a wide range of
personal and corporate trust and trust-related services which
includes serving as executor of estates, as trustee under
testamentary and inter vivos trusts and various pension and other
employee benefit plans, as guardian of the estates of minors and
incompetents, as escrow agent under various agreements, as transfer
agent and paying agent of registered bond issues, and as custodian
for assets invested. In addition, the Trust Department of First
Security Bank offers a variety of investment tools which includes a
money management and financial planning program that uses the skills
and abilities of a Certified Financial Planner and a Certified
Retirement Services Professional among other specialists who are
within the employment of First Security Bank and the Trust
Department.
In recent years, Security Capital Corporation has
opened several new locations to expand the First Security Banking
area. In October of 1998, First Security Banking locations at Como,
Mississippi, and Crenshaw, Mississippi, were purchased from First
Tennessee Bank. In July of 1999, Planters Bank in Tunica was
purchased from First Tennessee Bank. In December of 1995, a loan
production office opened in Desoto County in the city of Olive
Branch with one employee. In June of 1997, a full service bank
branch opened and continued First Security Bank’s operation in the
Olive Branch area with four employees. In October of 2001, First
Security Bank’s operation in Olive Branch moved to a newly
constructed building with features of four drive-thru lanes and a
total square footage of 7,000 to accommodate the projected growth in
that area. The number of employees at Olive Branch in 2002 grew to
twelve. In January 2001, a loan production office officially opened
in Desoto County in the city of Hernando. On July 1, 2002, the
operation in Hernando moved from a loan production facility to a
newly constructed building, a sister to the Olive Branch building,
providing full banking services. In August of 2003, a branch was
opened in the town of Pope. In 2004, First Security Bank prepared to
continue to expand in the Desoto County area with the construction
of a new branch in Southaven with an anticipated 2005 opening. The
Security Capital Corporation has offered ATM services for numerous
years and began in 1995 "running" its own ATMs. Today, First
Security Bank provides ATM services at twenty-two locations, fifteen
of which are not located on bank property. First Security Bank,
also, provides the customer with 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
access to their account balances and activity through a telephone
banking product called First Line. Initiated in October of 2002,
First Security Bank offered internet banking, called First Teller,
to accommodate those customers desiring through technology to review
their account’s activity and images of the activity, if applicable,
and pay their bills from anywhere in the world.
Employees
On December 31, 2004, First Security Bank had 162
full-time equivalent employees.
Supervision and Regulation
Security Capital
Corporation and First Security Bank are subject to state and federal
banking laws and regulations which impose specific requirements or
restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight with
respect to virtually all aspects of operations. These laws and
regulations are generally intended to protect depositors, not
shareholders. To the extent that the following summary describes
statutory or regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory provisions.
Any change in applicable laws or regulations may have a material
effect on the business and prospects of Security Capital
Corporation. Beginning with the enactment of the Financial
Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA")
and following with Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement
Act of 1991 ("FDICIA") and the Gramm Leach Bliley Act of 1999 (the
"Financial Services Modernization Act"), numerous additional
regulatory requirements have been placed on the banking industry in
the past several years, and additional changes have been proposed.
The operations of Security Capital Corporation and First Security
Bank may be affected by legislative changes and the policies of
various regulatory authorities. Security Capital Corporation is
unable to predict the nature or the extent of the effect on its
business and earnings that fiscal or monetary policies, economic
control, or new federal or state legislation may have in the future.
Security Capital Corporation is a bank holding company
within the meaning of the federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956
(the "BHCA").
The BHCA.
Under the BHCA, Security Capital Corporation is subject
to periodic examination by the Federal Reserve and is required to
file periodic reports of its operations and such additional
information as the Federal Reserve may require. Security Capital
Corporation's and First Security Bank' activities are limited to
banking, managing or controlling banks, furnishing services to or
performing services for its subsidiaries, and engaging in other
activities that the Federal Reserve determines to be so closely
related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a
proper incident thereto.
Investments, Control, and Activities.
With certain limited exceptions, the BHCA requires
every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the
Federal Reserve before (i) acquiring substantially all the assets of
any bank, (ii) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of
any voting shares of any bank if after such acquisition it would own
or control more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank (unless it
already owns or controls the majority of such shares), or (iii)
merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.
In addition, and subject to certain exceptions, the
BHCA and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with regulations
thereunder, require Federal Reserve approval (or, depending on the
circumstances, no notice of disapproval) prior to any person or
company acquiring "control" of a bank holding company, such as
Security Capital Corporation. Control is conclusively presumed to
exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class
of voting securities of the bank holding company. Control is
rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more but
less than 25% of any class of voting securities and either Security
Capital Corporation has registered securities under Section 12 of
the Exchange Act or no other person owns a greater percentage of
that class of voting securities immediately after the transaction.
The regulations provide a procedure for challenge of the rebuttable
control presumption.
Under the BHCA, a bank holding company is generally
prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring direct or indirect control
of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in
nonbanking activities, unless the Federal Reserve Board, by order or
regulation, has found those activities to be so closely related to
banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident
thereto. Some of the activities that the Federal Reserve Board has
determined by regulation to be proper incidents to the business of a
bank holding company include making or servicing loans and certain
types of leases, engaging in certain insurance and discount
brokerage activities, performing certain data processing services,
acting in certain circumstances as a fiduciary or investment or
financial adviser, owning savings associations, and making
investments in certain corporations or projects designed primarily
to promote community welfare.
The Federal Reserve Board has imposed certain capital
requirements on bank holding companies under the BHCA, including a
minimum leverage ratio and a minimum ratio of "qualifying" capital
to risk weighted assets. These requirements are described below
under "Capital Regulations." Subject to its capital requirements and
certain other restrictions, Security Capital Corporation may borrow
money to make a capital contribution to First Security Bank, and
such loans may be repaid from dividends paid from First Security
Bank to Security Capital Corporation (although the ability of First
Security Bank to pay dividends is subject to regulatory restrictions
as described below in "Dividends" under Item 5). Security Capital
Corporation is also able to raise capital for contribution to First
Security Bank by issuing securities without having to receive
regulatory approval, subject to compliance with federal and state
securities laws.
Source of Strength; Cross Guarantee.
In accordance with Federal Reserve Board policy,
Security Capital Corporation is expected to act as a source of
financial strength to First Security Bank and to commit resources to
support First Security Bank in circumstances in which Security
Capital Corporation might not otherwise do so. Under the BHCA, the
Federal Reserve Board may require a bank holding company to
terminate any activity or relinquish control of a nonbank subsidiary
(other than a nonbank subsidiary of a bank) upon the Federal Reserve
Board's determination that such activity or control constitutes a
serious risk to the financial soundness or stability of any
subsidiary depository institution of the bank holding company.
Further, federal bank regulatory authorities have additional
discretion to require a bank holding company to divest itself of any
bank or nonbank subsidiary if the agency determines that divestiture
may aid the depository institution's financial condition.
State and FDIC Regulation.
First Security Bank is subject to regulation and
periodic examinations by the FDIC and the State of Mississippi
Department of Banking and Consumer Finance. These regulatory
authorities examine such areas as reserves, loan and investment
quality, management policies, procedures and practices and other
aspects of operations. These examinations are designed for the
protection of the Banks' depositors, rather than their stockholders.
In addition to these regular examinations, the Company and the Banks
must furnish periodic reports to their respective regulatory
authorities containing a full and accurate statement of their
affairs.
FDICIA.
All insured institutions must undergo regular on site
examinations by their appropriate banking agency. The cost of
examinations of insured depository institutions and any affiliates
may be assessed by the appropriate agency against each institution
or affiliate as it deems necessary or appropriate. Insured
institutions are required to submit annual reports to the FDIC and
the appropriate agency (and state supervisor when applicable).
FDICIA also directs the FDIC to develop with other appropriate
agencies a method for insured depository institutions to provide
supplemental disclosure of the estimated fair market value of assets
and liabilities, to the extent feasible and practicable, in any
balance sheet, financial statement, report of condition, or any
other report of any insured depository institution. FDICIA also
requires the federal banking regulatory agencies to prescribe, by
regulation, standards for all insured depository institutions and
depository institution holding companies relating, among other
things, to: (i) internal controls, information systems, and audit
systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit underwriting; (iv)
interest rate risk exposure; and (v) asset quality.
FDICIA contains a "prompt corrective action" section
intended to resolve problem institutions at the least possible
long-term cost to the deposit insurance funds. Pursuant to this
section, the federal banking agencies are required to prescribe a
leverage limit and a risk-based capital requirement indicating
levels at which institutions will be deemed to be "well
capitalized," "adequately capitalized," "undercapitalized,"
"significantly undercapitalized" and "critically undercapitalized."
In the case of a depository institution that is "critically
undercapitalized" (a term defined to include institutions which
still have positive net worth), the federal banking regulators are
generally required to appoint a conservator or receiver.
Deposit Insurance.
The FDIC establishes rates for the payment of premiums
by federally insured banks and thrifts for deposit insurance. A
separate Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") and Savings Association
Insurance Fund ("SAIF") are maintained for commercial banks and
thrifts, respectively, with insurance premiums from the industry
used to offset losses from insurance payouts when banks and thrifts
fail. Since 1993, insured depository institutions like First
Security Bank have paid for deposit insurance under a risk based
premium system.
Transactions With Affiliates and Insiders.
First Security Bank is subject to Section 23A of the
Federal Reserve Act, which places limits on the amount of loans to,
and certain other transactions with, affiliates, as well as on the
amount of advances to third parties collateralized by the securities
or obligations of affiliates. The aggregate of all covered
transactions is limited in amount, as to any one affiliate, to 10%
of the Bank's capital and surplus and, as to all affiliates
combined, to 20% of the Bank's capital and surplus. Furthermore,
within the foregoing limitations as to amount, each covered
transaction must meet specified collateral requirements.
First Security Bank is also subject to Section 23B of
the Federal Reserve Act, which prohibits an institution from
engaging in certain transactions with affiliates unless the
transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as
favorable to such institution, as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies. First Security
Bank is subject to certain restrictions on extensions of credit to
executive officers, directors, certain principal shareholders, and
their related interests. Such extensions of credit (i) must be made
on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and
collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with third parties and (ii) must not involve more than
the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.
Community Reinvestment Act.
The Community Reinvestment Act requires that, in
connection with examinations of financial institutions within their
respective jurisdictions, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, the OCC, or
the Office of Thrift Supervision shall evaluate the record of the
financial institutions in meeting the credit needs of their local
communities, including low and moderate income neighborhoods,
consistent with the safe and sound operation of those institutions.
These factors are also considered in evaluating mergers,
acquisitions, and applications to open a branch or facility.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley Act"),
which became law on July 30, 2002, added new legal requirements for
all publicly-held companies affecting corporate governance,
accounting and corporate reporting. The Securities and Exchange
Commission has been delegated the task of enacting rules to
implement various provisions, and the Company is required to comply
with such rules to the extent they are applicable to the Company. In
addition, each of the national stock exchanges has developed new
corporate governance rules, including rules strengthening director
independence requirements for boards, the adoption of corporate
governance codes, and charters for the nominating and audit
committees.
Other Regulations.
Interest and certain other charges collected or
contracted for by First Security Bank are subject to state usury
laws and certain federal laws concerning interest rates. First
Security Bank's loan operations are subject to certain federal laws
applicable to credit transactions, such as the federal Truth In
Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer
borrowers; the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring
financial institutions to provide information to enable the public
and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is
fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs community
it serves; the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting
discrimination on the basis of creed or other prohibited factors in
extending credit; the Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, governing
the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;
the Fair Debt Collection Act, concerning the manner in which
consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and the
rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with
the responsibility of implementing such federal laws. The deposit
operations of First Security Bank also are subject to the Right to
Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain
confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes
procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial
records, and the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E
issued by the Federal Reserve Board to implement that Act, which
governs automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts
and customers' rights and liabilities arising from the use of
automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.
Enforcement Powers.
FIRREA expanded and increased civil and criminal
penalties available for use by the federal regulatory agencies
against depository institutions and certain "institution affiliated
parties" (primarily including management, employees, and agents of a
financial institution, independent contractors such as attorneys and
accountants, and others who participate in the conduct of the
financial institution's affairs). These practices can include the
failure of an institution to timely file required reports; the
filing of false or misleading information; or the submission of
inaccurate reports. Civil penalties may be as high as $1,000,000 a
day for such violations. Criminal penalties for some financial
institution crimes have been increased to twenty years. In addition,
regulators are provided with greater flexibility to commence
enforcement actions against institutions and institution affiliated
parties. Possible enforcement actions include the termination of
deposit insurance. Furthermore, FIRREA expanded the appropriate
banking agencies' power to issue cease and desist orders that may,
among other things, require affirmative action to correct any harm
resulting from a violation or practice, including restitution,
reimbursement, indemnifications, or guarantees against loss. A
financial institution may also be ordered to restrict its growth,
dispose of certain assets, rescind agreements or contracts, or take
other actions as determined by the ordering agency to be
appropriate.
Effect of Governmental Monetary Policies.
The earnings of First Security Bank are affected by
domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of
the United States government and its agencies. The Federal Reserve
Board's monetary policies have had, and are likely to continue to
have, an important impact on the operating results of commercial
banks through its power to implement national monetary policy in
order, among other things, to curb inflation or combat a recession.
The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have major
effects upon the levels of bank loans, investments, and deposits
through its open market operations in United States government
securities and through its regulation of the discount rate on
borrowings of member banks and the reserve requirements against
member bank deposits. It is not possible to predict the nature or
impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.
Financial Services Modernization Act.
On November 12, 1999, President Clinton signed into law
the Gramm Leach Bliley Act of 1999 (the "Financial Services
Modernization Act"). The Financial Services Modernization Act
repeals the two affiliation provisions of the Glass Steagall Act:
Section 20, which restricted the affiliation of Federal Reserve
Member Banks with firms "engaged principally" in specified
securities activities; and Section 32, which restricts officer,
director, or employee interlocks between a member bank and any
company or person "primarily engaged" in specified securities
activities. In addition, the Financial Services Modernization Act
also contains provisions that expressly preempt any state law
restricting the establishment of financial affiliations, primarily
related to insurance. The general effect of the law is to establish
a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial
banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial
service providers by revising and expanding the BHCA framework to
permit a holding company system to engage in a full range of
financial activities through a new entity known as a Financial
Holding Company. "Financial activities" is broadly defined to
include not only banking, insurance, and securities activities, but
also merchant banking and additional activities that the Federal
Reserve, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury,
determines to be financial in nature, incidental to such financial
activities, or complementary activities that do not pose a
substantial risk to the safety and soundness of depository
institutions or the financial system generally.
Generally, the Financial Services Modernization Act:
- Repeals historical restrictions on, and
eliminates many federal and state law barriers to, affiliations
among banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other
financial service providers;
- Provides a uniform framework for the
functional regulation of the activities of banks, savings
institutions, and their holding companies;
- Broadens the activities that may be conducted
by national banks, banking subsidiaries of bank holding
companies, and their financial subsidiaries;
- Provides an enhanced framework for protecting
the privacy of consumer information;
- Adopts a number of provisions related to the
capitalization, membership, corporate governance, and other
measures designed to modernize the Federal Home Loan Bank
system;
- Modifies the laws governing the
implementation of the Community Reinvestment Act ("CRA"); and
- Addresses a variety of other legal and
regulatory issues affecting both day to day operations and long
term activities of financial institutions.
In order for a bank
holding company to take advantage of the ability to affiliate with
other financial services providers, that company must become a
"Financial Holding Company" as permitted under an amendment to the
BHCA. To become a Financial Holding Company, Security Capital
Corporation would file a declaration with the Federal Reserve,
electing to engage in activities permissible for Financial Holding
Companies and certifying that it is eligible to do so because all of
its insured depository institution subsidiaries are well capitalized
and well managed. In addition, the Federal Reserve must also
determine that each insured depository institution subsidiary of
Security Capital Corporation has at least a "satisfactory" CRA
rating.
The Financial Services Modernization Act also includes
a new section of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act governing
subsidiaries of state banks that engage in "activities as principal
that would only be permissible" for a national bank to conduct in a
financial subsidiary. It expressly preserves the ability of a state
bank to retain all existing subsidiaries. In order to form a
financial subsidiary, a state bank must be well capitalized, and the
state bank would be subject to the same capital deduction, risk
management and affiliate transaction rules as applicable to national
banks.
Security Capital Corporation and First Security Bank do
not believe that the Financial Services Modernization Act will have
a material adverse effect on operations in the near term. However,
to the extent that it permits banks, securities firms, and insurance
companies to affiliate, the financial services industry may
experience further consolidation. The Financial Services
Modernization Act is intended to grant to community banks certain
powers as a matter of right that larger institutions have
accumulated on an ad hoc basis. Nevertheless, this act may have the
result of increasing the amount of competition that Security Capital
Corporation and First Security Bank face from larger institutions
and other types of companies offering financial products, many of
which may have substantially more financial resources than Security
Capital Corporation and First Security Bank.
Capital.
Security Capital Corporation and First Security Bank
are required to comply with the capital adequacy standards
established by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC. There are two
basic measures of capital adequacy for bank holding companies and
their banking subsidiaries: a risk based measure and a leverage
measure.
The risk based capital standards are designed to make
regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in
risk profile among depository institutions and bank holding
companies, to account for off balance sheet exposure, and to
minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off
balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with
appropriate weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital
as a percentage of total risk weighted assets and off balance sheet
items.
The minimum guideline for the total capital to risk
weighted assets, including certain off balance sheet items such as
standby letters of credit ("total capital ratio") is 8.0 percent. At
least half of total capital must be composed of common equity,
undivided profits, minority interests in the equity accounts of
consolidated subsidiaries, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock,
and a limited amount of cumulative perpetual preferred stock, less
goodwill and certain other intangible assets ("Tier 1 capital"). The
remainder may consist of subordinated debt, other preferred stock, a
limited amount of loan loss reserves, and unrealized gains on equity
securities subject to limitations ("Tier 2 capital").
The following table represents the capital ratios for
Security Capital Corporation and First Security Bank as of December
31, 2004:
|
Risk-Based Capital Ratio |
Corporation Ratio |
Ratio |
Bank Requirements |
| Total Capital |
15.80 |
|
15.20 |
|
8 |
|
| Tier 1 Capital |
14.60 |
|
13.90 |
|
4 |
|
| Leverage Capital |
|
10.40 |
|
9.90 |
|
3 |
Deposit Insurance Assessments.
The deposits of First Security Bank are insured by the
FDIC up to the limits set forth under applicable law. A majority of
the deposits of First Security Bank are subject to the deposit
insurance assessments of the Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") of the
FDIC. However, a portion of First Security Bank's deposits, relating
to a savings association acquisition, are subject to assessments
imposed by the Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF") of the
FDIC. The FDIC equalized the assessment rates for BIF insured and
SAIF insured deposits effective January 1, 1997. The assessments
imposed on all FDIC deposits for deposit insurance have an effective
rate ranging from 0 to 27 basis points per $100 of insured deposits,
depending on the institution's capital position and other
supervisory factors. Legislation was enacted in 1996 requiring both
SAIF insured and BIF insured deposits to pay a pro rata portion of
the interest due on the obligations issued by the Financing
Corporation ("FICO"). Based on the assigned FICO debt service rates,
the assessments paid by the Bank during 2004 ranged from 1.54 basis
points to 1.46 basis points, per $100 of deposits. The assessments
for the first quarter of 2005 will be paid based on an assigned FICO
debt service rate of 1.44 basis points
Competition
The banking business is a highly competitive
business. Security Capital Corporation’s market area consists
principally of Panola, Quitman, Desoto and Tunica Counties in
Mississippi. Security Capital Corporation competes with other
financial institutions, as well as insurance companies and various
other entities, for deposits and in providing financial services in
these counties and the surrounding counties. Security Capital
Corporation, as provided by the FDIC Market Share Report of June 30,
2004 (the latest Market Share Report), held 56.45% of the deposit
market in Panola County. In Quitman County - an area with no growth
and poor economy in the best of years - this same report reflects
Security Capital Corporation holding 20.53 % of the deposit market.
In Desoto County, an area filled with large regional banks and
national banks, Security Capital Corporation occupies a growing
share of 5.83% of the deposit market as of June 30, 2004. Management
measures the success of the locations in this area, not only by the
growth of the deposits, but by its ability to continue to be
competitive and to grow in the loan production area. In Tunica
County, Security Capital Corporation experienced growth as indicated
by its 41.77% share of the deposit base.
Risk Factors
Because of the Lack of an Established
Trading Market and Restrictions on Transfer, Shareholders May
Not be Able to Quickly and Easily Sell Their Common Stock.
There has been no established or liquid market for the
Common Stock. Because of the substantial restrictions on
transfer of the Common Stock, Security Capital Corporation does
not anticipate that a reliable or liquid secondary trading
market for the Common Stock will exist or develop in the
foreseeable future.
Changes in Local Economic Conditions Could
Reduce Our Income and Growth, and Could Lead to Higher Levels of
Problem Loans and Charge-Offs.
Security Capital Corporation makes loans, and most of its
assets are located in Panola, Quitman, Desoto, and Tunica
Counties in Mississippi. Adverse changes in economic conditions
in these areas could hurt Security Capital Corporation's ability
to collect loans, could reduce the demand for loans, and could
negatively impact performance and financial condition.
Security Capital Corporation's
Profitability Depends on Economic Policies and Factors Beyond
Our Control.
Security Capital Corporation’s earnings depend to a great
extent on "rate differentials," which are the differences
between interest income that Security Capital Corporation earns
on loans and investments and the interest expense paid on
deposits and other borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive
to many factors which are beyond Security Capital Corporation’s
control, including general economic conditions and the policies
of various government and regulatory authorities. Changes in
interest rate policy by the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System affect Security Capital Corporation’s interest
income, interest expense and investment portfolio. Also,
governmental policies such as the creation of a tax deduction
for individual retirement accounts can increase savings and
affect the cost of funds. A rapid increase or decrease in
interest rates could have an adverse effect on the net interest
margin and results of operations of Security Capital
Corporation. The nature, timing and effect of any future changes
in federal monetary and fiscal policies on Security Capital
Corporation and its results of operations are not predictable.
There is No Assurance That Security Capital Corporation Will
be Able to Successfully Compete with Others for Business.
The banking business is highly competitive, and the
profitability of Security Capital Corporation depends
principally upon its ability to compete in the market areas
where its banking operations are located. Security Capital
Corporation competes with other commercial banks, savings banks,
savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage
companies, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies,
brokerage and investment banking firms, asset based non bank
lenders and certain other non financial entities, including
retail stores which may maintain their own credit programs and
certain governmental organizations which may offer more
favorable financing than Security Capital Corporation. Many of
these competitors have greater financial and other resources
than Security Capital Corporation, and certain larger
competitors are recent entrants into Security Capital
Corporation’s markets.
Available Information
The Company maintains an internet website at
www.firstsecuritybk.com. The Company, effective in 2004,
provided on its website the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and will in 2005 provide
these reports as well as the annual reports on Form 10-K, current
reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission These reports will be
available on the Company’s website as soon as reasonably practical
after the reports are filed with the Commission. Information on the
Company's website is not incorporated into this Form 10-K or the
Company's other securities filings and is not a part of them.
Electronic or paper copies of the reports will be provided, free of
charge, upon request by mail, through our website or in person.
Statistical Disclosure
The statistical disclosures for the Company are
contained in Tables 1 through 16.
Table 1 -
Five Year Financial Summary
Table 2
- Average Balances, Interest Earned and Interest Yields
Table 3 - Net Interest Earning
Assets
Table 3A -
Volume/Rate Analysis
Table 4
- Non-Interest Income and Expense
Table 5 - Loans by Type
Table 6 - Loan Liquidity
Table 7 - Allowance for Loan Losses
Table 8 - Nonperforming Assets
Table 8A - Allocation of the
Allowance for Loan Losses
Table 9
- Securities
Table 10 -
Securities Maturity and Repricing Schedule
Table 11 - Securities Weighted
Maturity and Tax Equivalent Yield by Classification
Table 12 - Deposit Information
Table 13 - Maturity Ranges of
Time Deposits with Balances More Than $100,000
Table 14 - Funding Uses and Sources
Table 15 - Liquidity; Interest
Rate Sensitivity
Table 15A
- Changes in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
Table 16 - Capital Ratios
|